High Potential (2024)
TV Show 2024

High Potential (2024)

8.0 /10
N/A Critics
2 Seasons
Morgan is a single mom with an exceptional mind, whose unconventional knack for solving crimes leads to an unusual and unstoppable partnership with a by-the-book seasoned detective.

When High Potential debuted on September 17, 2024, it arrived on ABC with the kind of quiet confidence that suggests someone genuinely believes in what they’re putting on screen. Drew Goddard, the creative mind behind this series, crafted something that felt both familiar and refreshingly different—a crime drama that didn’t rely on the usual procedural beats, but instead offered something more intricate and human. What’s remarkable is how quickly the show proved its staying power. We’re now watching a series that’s become a genuine phenomenon in network television, drawing massive audiences while maintaining the kind of critical respect that usually feels elusive for broadcast dramas.

Let’s talk about what makes High Potential stand out in a landscape crowded with crime shows and mysteries. The core premise centers on a character with an extraordinary mind navigating the criminal justice system, but Goddard’s execution transforms this into something more layered than your typical procedural framework. Over its first two seasons spanning 28 episodes, the show has demonstrated a commitment to character development that goes beyond solving the case of the week. There’s genuine stakes here—emotional, professional, and personal—that make you invest in these characters beyond their utility to the plot.

The audience response tells the real story. What started as a promising debut became an undeniable ratings juggernaut, particularly during its second season. The show’s expansion to earlier timeslots reflected ABC’s confidence in its appeal, and that confidence proved justified. We’re talking about drawing roughly 12.38 million viewers per episode by Season 2—an increase of 19 percent from its already-strong debut season. That kind of growth trajectory rarely happens with dramas anymore, especially on network television where viewership tends to stabilize or decline over time.

This isn’t just a ratings success story—it’s evidence that audiences still crave intelligent, character-driven drama. High Potential proved that network television could compete with prestige streaming content by simply committing to excellence in storytelling.

What deserves examination is how the show manages its structure without adhering to traditional runtimes. The Unknown runtime for episodes actually becomes part of the show’s creative strength. Rather than forcing narratives into standard commercial breaks or predetermined lengths, High Potential allowed stories to breathe—to take the time they needed, whether that’s 42 minutes or something different. This flexibility enabled Goddard and his team to prioritize story logic over scheduling convenience, a rarity in broadcast television.

The 8.0/10 rating reflects something important: this show earned respect from both casual viewers and television critics. That’s a delicate balance, and it suggests the writing operates on multiple levels. There are moments designed for pure entertainment value, but there’s also genuine intellectual engagement happening beneath the surface. The mystery elements satisfy procedural fans, but the character work offers something deeper for viewers seeking more meaningful drama. It’s this duality that likely contributed to the show’s cultural footprint.

Speaking of cultural impact, High Potential arrived at precisely the right moment in television history. Network drama has been struggling for years, with audiences fragmenting across streaming services and cable alternatives. Yet this show proved there was still an appetite for the kind of appointment television that broadcast networks could provide—if they committed to quality and respected their audience’s intelligence. The show’s success influenced the broader conversation about what network television could achieve, opening doors for other drama series to invest more heavily in character complexity and serialized storytelling elements.

The conversations sparked by the series centered on several key elements that made it resonate.

  • Character authenticity in how neurodivergence and exceptional intelligence were portrayed
  • Female-driven narratives that didn’t require tokenism or apology for their female protagonist’s capabilities
  • Workplace dynamics that felt realistic rather than caricatured
  • Mystery construction that rewarded attentive viewers without becoming gratuitously convoluted

The creative achievement here deserves particular attention. Goddard brought the kind of meticulous craftsmanship he’s known for—whether from his work in genre television or film—and applied it to broadcast drama’s constraints. Rather than seeing those constraints as limitations, he seemed to view them as creative challenges. The result is a show that maximizes emotional impact within traditional television frameworks while still pushing boundaries in how character and narrative interact.

By Season 2, High Potential had established itself as not just a ratings winner, but a cultural touchstone. The show’s ability to grow its audience—becoming one of the most-watched programs on network television—suggested something important: audiences hadn’t abandoned network drama. They’d simply been waiting for network drama to stop underestimating them. This series demonstrated that commitment to intelligent storytelling, strong performances, and genuine character development could still find massive audiences through traditional television.

High Potential represents a turning point for network television, proving that broadcast drama could compete with the most ambitious content available anywhere.

What makes this show worthy of your attention now, as it returns for its third season, is exactly what made it worthy initially: it trusts its audience and respects its craft. In an era of streaming oversaturation and exhausting prestige television, High Potential offers something increasingly rare—accessible, intelligent drama that entertains without requiring a PhD or a spreadsheet to follow along. It’s serialized enough to reward investment but constructed well enough that new viewers can jump in without feeling lost. That’s genuinely difficult to execute, and Goddard’s team has managed it across 28 episodes with consistency and growing confidence. That’s television worth your time.

Related TV Shows